Skip to navigation

Duuh Celebs

« Write when you get work | Main | Testing new template »

March 11, 2005

Canada to become Paparazzi free

Celebs seeking privacy to frolic nude and engage in sexual activities in public will find that Canada will be the perfect haven destinations come summer time. A Canadian law (bill c-2) if passed would criminalize any act of recording voyeurism with some stiff penalties of up to 10 years in jail for taking or publishing videos and pictures.
Here’s an excerpt of the bill:
Clause 6 of Bill C-2 inserts a new offence of voyeurism into Part V (Sexual Offences) of the Criminal Code. In keeping with the previously mentioned public consultation document and responses thereto, the new law targets voyeurism as both a sexual offence and a privacy offence. For example, section 162(1)(c) makes it an offence to “surreptitiously” observe or make a visual recording of a person “in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy,” where that is done “for a sexual purpose.” In addition, proposed section 162(1) makes the same surreptitious observation or recording an offence, if the person being observed or recorded is: (a) in a place in which they can “reasonably be expected” to be nude; to expose their genital organs, anal region or breasts; or to be engaged in explicit sexual activity, or: (b) in such a state or engaged in such activity and the observation or recording is done for the purposes of seeing or recording it. As a result, voyeurism could also be prosecuted as an offence against privacy, whether undertaken for commercial profit, to harass the complainant, or for some other non-sexual purpose.

Proposed section 162(2) defines the term “visual recording,” while section 162(3) exempts police officers from the application of the new privacy-related offence, when they are engaged in judicially authorized surveillance. Proposed section 162(4) extends criminal liability to anyone who “prints, copies, publishes, distributes, circulates, sells, advertises or makes available” such a recording or has it in his or her possession for such a purpose, knowing that it was “obtained by the commission of an offence” under section 162(1). Section 162(5) makes voyeurism a hybrid offence, punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment, when prosecuted by indictment, or up to 6 months following summary conviction. Finally, sections 162(6) and (7) exempt liability for acts that serve the “public good” and set out the limits of that defense

My planned summer hobby of taking pictures of male celebs at Montreal glory holes has just been dashed.

Canadian Parliement

Angelina lesbian exploits.
Angelina Jolie in a recent interview with OK! Magazine reveals she sleeps with women and that she is an expert in the art of lesbian lovemaking.
She is quoted as saying: "you know how to do things a certain way." with women.
On the accusations of her sleeping with Brad Pitt: "Brad is a married man. I wouldn't sleep with a married man. I have enough lovers. I don't need Brad."

Other confessions in the interview reveals that not only does she sleep with women but includes multiples partners and sex with friends.

Do multiple partners include Hollywood execs?
bradangelina175.jpg
Angelina and Brad taking a break.

All Lindsay all the time
Page six was reporting yesterday seeing Lindsay Lohan (18) and Bruce Willis (50) in some hot groping action at an after-after party held for the screening of Bruce’s new movie “Hostage”.
It didn’t take long for her PR lackey’s to dismiss this as: "She is not interested in Bruce Willis in any way but as the producer of her next film."

They must have had an interesting conversation about her next project in bed.
r1088945486.jpg

Any publicity is good publicity
So you thought that T-mobile would tank after the Paris Hilton sidekick hack, think again. Sales have been rocking for T-mobile Sidekick with it selling out in certain areas.

The only exception to the rule would be Michael Jackson, unless of course people start wearing fashionable pajama bottoms as regular wear.
From Tech news

What's wrong with this picture
dumbass.jpg

Interresting links
Acme Girls : Nude celebrity directory
Hollywood hoes : Nude celebrity sites
I like Bukake: Catchy tune
The vodka experiment: How to turn cheap ass vodka into some premium kind.
Michael Jackson's favourite things

View more celebrity videos at Nude Celebrity Theater

Posted by Nick at March 11, 2005 04:17 PM

Comments

WTF is wrong with that picture damn you!

Posted by: Josh at March 12, 2005 03:49 AM

well if you look at the name of the picture it is dumbass...and looking at the picture the bozo dosen't know how to spell arithmatic..he put arithetic.. sheesh and im the blond one.. arghhhh!!!!!

p.s not all the pictures have to have dicks and pussy in them...lol

Posted by: "THE MILF" at March 12, 2005 11:11 PM

Ok Oops...he was trying to spell arithmetic..
what does it matter..arithmatic arithmetic..whatever same shit different spelling..

Posted by: "THE MILF" at March 12, 2005 11:26 PM

Actually there is a difference in spelling and meaning for arithmatic and arithmetic

Arithmatic is a programming language originally known as A-3 and developped in the 50's

Arithmetic has to do with math.

And that kids ends our spelling lessons for the day.

Posted by: Nick at March 12, 2005 11:47 PM

HAHAHAH I saw the difference ..i was too tired to write it...thanks teacher ;)

Posted by: "THE MILF" at March 13, 2005 01:18 AM

I think the sign is hilarious.

Posted by: Leroy at March 16, 2005 11:56 PM

Glad to hear the difference between "arithmatic" and " arithmetic" but, WTF is "arithetic"?

Posted by: Dale at June 24, 2005 09:57 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?


Top page